Pertamina’s Crisis Communication Response Strategy in The Adulterated Fuel Case: A Quantitative Content Analysis of CNN Indonesia and Kompas.Com News

Main Article Content

Risma Nurbani Ilham
Dian Purworini

Abstract

This study is motivated by a public trust crisis toward PT Pertamina following allegations of fuel adulteration from Pertalite to Pertamax. This incident triggered massive financial losses and a severe reputational threat. This research aims to describe Pertamina's crisis communication response strategy based on the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and analyze differences in tendency of implementing these strategies in CNN Indonesia and Kompas.com. The method used is quantitative content analysis with purposive sampling. The total sample includes 50 news articles (25 from CNN Indonesia, 25 from Kompas.com) during the peak crisis period of February-March 2025. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. The results show a deviation from the ideal assumptions of SCCT. In a preventable crisis requiring a rebuild (accommodative) strategy, Pertamina predominantly used the Denial strategy at 60% (15 articles) in each media outlet. The Mann-Whitney U test yielded a significance value of 0.861 (Sig. > 0.05), thus the null hypothesis (H0) is accepted. In conclusion, there is no significant difference regarding the tendency of Pertamina’s crisis response strategies in both media. Both outlets uniformly display the dominance of Pertamina’s defensive communication approach (denial posture) in managing public perception.

Article Details

Section
Communication
Author Biography

Risma Nurbani Ilham, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

Undergraduate Student, Department of Communication Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

References

Adiprasetio, J., & Larasati, A. W. (2020). Pandemic Crisis in Online Media: Quantitative Framing Analysis on detik.com’s Coverage of Covid-19. 153–170. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.

AJI Indonesia, R. (2024). Di Antara Literasi dan Bias Politik Studi tentang Tingkat Kepercayaan Publik terhadap Media di Indonesia. Aliansi Jurnalis Independen.

Amin, M., & Djalil, N. A. (2024). Local Government Crisis Communication Strategy: Case Study of Demands for Arrears in Employee Income Additional Payments. Journal La Bisecoman, 05(03), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v5i3.1235.

Aquino, R., & Alam, W. D. K. (2023). Efek Mediasi Nilai Konsumen Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen. Fluralis, 2(2), 32–44.

Arifianto, B. S. (2025). Jajak Pendapat Kompas: Konsumen BBM Tengah Ragu dengan Kualitas Produk Pertamina. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-jejak-pendapat-kompas-konsumen-bbm-tengah-ragu-dengan-kualitas-produk-pertamina.

Aurelia, G., Ugahari, A., & Apriliani, R. (2025). Analisis Situational Crisis Communication Theory ( SCCT ) pada Strategi Komunikasi Krisis Brand Erspo dalam Kasus Kontroversi Jersey Timnas Indonesia. 4(3), 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v4i3.5362.

Badu, J., Ivar, B., Gunhild, K., & Saetren, B. (2023). Crisis communication and trustworthiness among crisis actors : towards a typology of crisis management difficulties. 119–130.

Boyer, M. M., & Lecheler, S. (2024). Don’t Throw the Frame Out With the Bathwater : How Episodic News Frames Can Prevent Identity-Motivated Reasoning. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(4), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221097057.

CELIOS. (2025). Berapa Banyak Kerugian Masyarakat dari Pertamax Oplosan ? Rekap Hasil Pengaduan Masyarakat dan Modelling Consumer Loss. Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS) dan LBH Jakarta Jakarta, Indonesia.

CNN Indonesia. (2025). BBM Pertamax Diduga Oplosan, Ini Jawaban Pertamina. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/otomotif/20250226082611-579-1202502/bbm-pertamax-diduga-oplosan-ini-jawaban-pertamina.

Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049.

Coombs, W. T. (2022). Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT). In In The Handbook of Crisis Communication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119678953.ch14.

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets: Initial Tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237233.

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2008). Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 34(3).

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). The Handbook of Crisis Communication (W. Timothy Coombs and Sherry J. Holladay (Ed.)). A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.

Faizal, K. A., & Masitoh, S. (2025). Situational Crisis Communication Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Digital Dalam Menangani Kasus Kebocoran Data Pdns Di Era Digital. 13(1), 267–281.

Hidayati, N. R., & Purworini, D. (2025). Strategi Respons Krisis Organisasi: Analisis Isi Kuantitatif Dengan Teori SCCT. Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(01), 38–49.